Perception of Nursing Faculty on the Integration of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Clinical Simulation
Main Article Content
Keywords
Virtual reality, Augmented reality, Nursing education, Clinical simulation, Educational technology
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are emerging technologies with significant educational potential, particularly in clinical simulations. This study aimed to analyze the perception of nursing faculty regarding the use of VR and AR in these courses, assessing their satisfaction and knowledge through a quantitative approach. A questionnaire based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used, evaluating four dimensions: ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude, and pedagogical applicability.
The results indicate that faculty perceive these technologies as easy to use, innovative, and motivational, highlighting their positive impact on active learning and students' academic performance. Furthermore, they believe that VR and AR enhance content comprehension and foster a more dynamic and interactive educational experience.
In conclusion, it is recommended to expand the implementation of VR and AR in clinical simulation courses to optimize their contribution to the educational process for nursing students.
References
2. Calderón SJ, Tumino MC, Bournissen M. Realidad virtual: impacto en el aprendizaje percibido de estudiantes de ciencias de la salud. Tecnol Cienc Educ [Internet]. 2019;16:65-82. Disponible en: https://www.tecnologia-ciencia-educacion.com/index.php/TCE/article/view/441
3. Yong-Varela LA. Modelo de aceptación tecnológica (TAM) para determinar los efectos de las dimensiones de cultura nacional en la aceptación de las TIC. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, SOCIOTAM [Internet]. 2010;14(1):131-71. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=65414107
4. Unal E, Uzun AM. Understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use Edmodo through the lens of an extended technology acceptance model. Br J Educ Technol. 2020;52:619-37. doi:10.1111/bjet.13046
5. Sun S, Xiong C, Chang V. Acceptance of Information and Communication Technologies in Education: An Investigation Into University Students' Intentions to Use Mobile Educational Apps. Int J Enterp Inf Syst (IJEIS). 2019;15(1):24-44. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.2019010102
6. Sánchez Flores F. Fundamentos epistémicos de la investigación cualitativa y cuantitativa: consensos y disensos. Rev Digit Investig Docencia Univ. 2019;13(1):102-22. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2019.644
7. Souza-Junior VD, Mendes IAC, Tori R, Marques LP, Mashuda FKK, Hirano LAF, et al. VIDA-Nursing v1.0: immersive virtual reality in vacuum blood collection among adults. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3263. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3685.3263
8. Caballero-Garriazo J, Rojas-Huacanca J, Sánchez-Castro A, Lázaro-Aguirre A. Revisión sistemática sobre la aplicación de la realidad virtual en la educación universitaria. Rev Electrónica Educare. 2023;27(3):463-80. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.15359/ree.27-3.17271
9. Calderón SJ, Tumino MC, Bournissen M. Realidad virtual: impacto en el aprendizaje percibido de estudiantes de ciencias de la salud. Tecnol Cienc Educ [Internet]. 2019;16:65-82. Disponible en: https://www.tecnologia-ciencia-educacion.com/index.php/TCE/article/view/441
10. Claros-Perdomo D, Millán-Rojas E, Gallego-Torres A. Uso de la realidad aumentada, gamificación y m-learning. Rev Fac Ing. 2020;29(54). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v29.n54.2020.12264
11. Moro C, Birt J, Stromberga Z, Phelps C, Clark J, Glasziou P, et al. Virtual and augmented reality enhancements to medical and science student physiology and anatomy test performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(3):368-76. Disponible en: 10.1002/ase.2049
12. Nesenbergs K, Abolins V, Ormanis J, Mednis A. Use of augmented and virtual reality in remote higher education: a systematic umbrella review. Educ Sci. 2021;11(1):1-12. Disponible en: 10.3390/educsci11010008
13. Lozano Colás M. Aplicación y eficacia de la realidad virtual en la educación de Enfermería: revisión de alcance [Internet]. 2022. Disponible en: https://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/203826/TFG_2023_Col%C3%A1s_%20Mayke_Lozano.pdf?sequence=1
14. Lange AK, Koch J, Beck A, Neugebauer T, Watzema F, Wrona KJ, et al. Learning with virtual reality in nursing education: qualitative interview study among nursing students using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. JMIR Nurs. 2020;3(1):e20249. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279447/
15. Ferreira RS. Uma revisão crítica sobre a realidade virtual como ferramenta de ensino-aprendizagem no ensino superior [Internet]. 2021. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4762/476268269011/html/
16. Jamali S, Shiratuddin M, Wong K, Oskam C. Utilising mobile-augmented reality for learning human anatomy. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 2015;197:659-68. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.054
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RHCS uses the Creative Commons License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). For more information, please visit
Milena Vega Villalobos, Escuela de Enfermería, Universidad Hispanoamericana. San José, Costa Rica.
Licenciada en Enfermería, Master en Enfermería Ginecológica, Obstétrica y Perinatal
MSc Glenda Esquivel Brenes, Escuela de Medicina y Cirugía, Universidad Hispanoamericana. San José, Costa Rica
Licenciada en Enfermería, Máster en Enfermería Oncológica